FAA Head: Safety, Privacy Concerns Abound In Regulating Drones : All Tech Considered The Federal Aviation Administration is under pressure to come up with rules for the commercial use of drones. The central issue: How can they fly safely in the same airspace as other aircraft?
NPR logo

FAA Head: Safety, Privacy Concerns Abound In Regulating Drones

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/309746615/309840563" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
FAA Head: Safety, Privacy Concerns Abound In Regulating Drones

FAA Head: Safety, Privacy Concerns Abound In Regulating Drones

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/309746615/309840563" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript


The Federal Aviation Administration is under orders from Congress to safely integrate unmanned aircraft into U.S. air space by September of 2015. FAA administrator Michael Huerta joins us now. Welcome to the program.

MICHAEL HUERTA: Thank you. It's great to be here.

SIEGEL: And let me try to understand this. If anybody, more or less, can operate a model aircraft below 400 feet, why shouldn't businesses be able to do that, too?

HUERTA: Well the thing that we care about, first and foremost, is the safety of our national air space system. And these aircraft operate very differently and they operate in the same airspace with a wide variety of other users. We understand that Congress wants us to implement by September of next year and our emphasis is on insuring that we're able to do it very safely.

SIEGEL: But at least for now, in terms of regulations governing these craft, is it simple an extrapolation of model aircraft rules?

HUERTA: It's not. Model aircraft are generally used by hobbyists, they're much more limited in range and they don't have the same performance characteristics.

SIEGEL: Here's a hypothetical, by the way. I walk out of my house and there, about 250 feet about my lawn is a strange uninvited and frankly unwanted, unmanned flying object. Am I within my rights, assuming that I'm complying with all the gun laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, to go get a rifle and shoot it down or does whoever owns that thing have a right to hover over my property?

HUERTA: You've illustrated one of the big complex questions that we have been dealing with with the use of unmanned aircraft for a long time. And that is, how are these things used and is there the potential for them to infringe upon your right to privacy? We do have a lot of laws in the country that are designed to protect property or to protect your privacy. The question that is starting to be asked is, does this technology in any way change that?

SIEGEL: Yeah, you haven't given me the green light to shoot down the unmanned drone over my lawn yet, but I...

HUERTA: You shouldn't be shooting anything down.

SIEGEL: I shouldn't be shooting, but what I don't hear you saying that it's obvious that I'm not within my rights to get that thing off my property.

HUERTA: What is clear is that you have a right to be concerned about is an unmanned aircraft over your property infringing on your right to privacy? And I think that we as a government need to figure out, is there something unique about this technology that would cause us to treat it differently than the constitutional protections you already have?

SIEGEL: There's a recent poll by the Pew Research Center which found that 63 percent of Americans think it would be a change for the worse if personal and commercial drones were given permission to fly through most U.S. air space. As you approach rules by September of next year, how much does public opinion, does the expression of public opinion figure, or do you assume it's the shock of the new and you assume a negative reaction to it?

HUERTA: This is something that is very new to a lot of people. And while a lot of people see great potential, other people have - and, in fact, sometimes the same people, have significant concern about what does it mean? And what this really argues for is a very thoughtful, a very deliberative, a very consultative approach to how we gradually open up the skies to the use of unmanned aircraft.

SIEGEL: The way problems over the use of drones arise these days, often, someone sees video on a television station, on a news telecast and then there's an investigation of that. That suggests that a lot of enforcement is after the fact, after one sees that something has been done.

SIEGEL: How do you actually enforce regulations? Do you have any way of actually policing the skies, if a few years from now or a couple of decades from now, there are thousands of little things hovering around jut above our homes?

HUERTA: We rely on our inspectors. We rely on the public, we rely on the industry. Everyone plays a role in bringing information to us that helps us carry out our mandate.

SIEGEL: This is enforcement by crowdsourcing is what you're describing.


HUERTA: Well, I think that enforcing any rule is dependent upon the public having a good understanding of what the rules are and every citizen playing a role in working with their government to ensure that the system is safe.

SIEGEL: Mr. Huerta, thank you very much for talking with us today.

HUERTA: Thank you.

SIEGEL: Michael Huerta is the administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, which is chartered by Congress with safely integrating unmanned aircraft into U.S. airspace by September of next year.

Copyright © 2014 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.