Organic Farmers Call Foul On Whole Foods' Produce Rating System : The Salt Some organic farmers are protesting a new system Whole Foods is using to rate its suppliers. They say the system devalues the organic label because nonorganic producers can earn the highest grades.
NPR logo

Organic Farmers Call Foul On Whole Foods' Produce Rating System

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/411779324/413849188" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Organic Farmers Call Foul On Whole Foods' Produce Rating System

Organic Farmers Call Foul On Whole Foods' Produce Rating System

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/411779324/413849188" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

Hardly anybody really likes being graded. And right now, some organic farmers are upset because of how the supermarket chain Whole Foods has started grading their produce. The farmers say Whole Foods' grading system actually diminishes the value of organic vegetables and fruits. NPR's Dan Charles reports.

DAN CHARLES, BYLINE: Whole Foods came up with this system, it says, because people these days want to know more about how their food is grown. Here's Matt Rogers, a global produce coordinator for the company.

MATT ROGERS: We're very proud of the food that we sell, and we know a lot about it, in general. And we want to share that with customers.

CHARLES: You could always see what country or state the vegetables at Whole Foods came from, also whether they're grown organically. But the new rating system takes into account much more. Whole Foods is asking its suppliers to answer a long questionnaire about how they use irrigation water, energy, fertilizer, pesticides, how they treat their workers. And based on the answers, a farm's produce gets a grade. It can be unrated, good, better or best. And those grades show up right beside each bin of produce on brightly-colored stickers with the words, responsibly grown. But here's the thing that's arousing controversy.

I'm here at a Whole Foods store in Washington, D.C. And I see a couple of bins of tomatoes and onions. They're conventional, presumably grown with standard fertilizer and pesticides. They got a best rating under this new system. And meanwhile, over here, not too far away, I see some organic tomatoes that got a lower grade, good. And here are some organic onions that just say, unrated. Now, for some organic farmers, getting a lower grade like this is just dumbfounding.

VERNON PETERSON: Organic is responsibly grown, for goodness sake. Organic should be the foundation of anything Whole Foods might do.

CHARLES: That's Vernon Peterson, who grows and packs organic fruit in Kingsburg, Calif. Peterson says organic certification means a whole lot more than this new, responsibly grown rating from Whole foods. Following the organic rules, he says, is tough and often expensive. Also, there are third-party auditors making sure that you follow the rules. The Whole Foods system does not have that. He thinks these new, responsibly grown labels don't give enough credit for all that work. In fact, they devalue organic certification. Tom Willey, another long-time organic grower in California, has been urging his fellow farmers to take a stand against the new ratings. It feels risky to criticize a big customer like Whole Foods, he says, but we have to speak up.

TOM WILLEY: Because we think that this program is kind of the tip of an iceberg that represents an existential threat to the value of certified organic, which many of us have devoted three, four decades of our working lives to.

CHARLES: Peterson and Willey are trying to convince Whole Foods to revise its ratings to give more weight to organic certification, also to make it less costly for small farmers to get their produce rated. Mark Kastel, an organic advocate and founder of the Cornucopia Institute, says there's a clear profit-driven motive behind this rating system.

MARK KASTEL: They're trying to create an entire new vernacular for their customers to recognize a value-added product.

CHARLES: And it's especially helpful to create that aura of specialness around conventional produce because conventional veggies are easier and cheaper to grow. This label lets them compete better with organic.

KASTEL: Why would you pay more for a certified organic product when you could buy the very best for a couple of dollars per pound cheaper?

CHARLES: Whole Foods, for its part, insists that it is not trying to undermine organic farming. Matt Rogers, the Whole Foods produce coordinator, says this is a way to talk to farmers and customers about things that the organic rules just don't touch.

ROGERS: Such as water conservation, energy use in agriculture, farm worker welfare, waste management.

CHARLES: There are farmers who are doing a great job with all of that, he says, and they aren't all organic farmers.

ROGERS: There are conventional growers that we work with who are incredible stewards of their land, who do a tremendous job with their work force and who deserve to be recognized for that work.

CHARLES: Organic farmers like Willey and Peterson agree, actually, that there are a lot of important aspects of responsible farming that the organic standards don't cover. Their dispute with Whole Foods is whether the company's new ratings actually measure all those things very well, also whether those things could ever outweigh what organic certification represents. Dan Charles, NPR News.

Copyright © 2015 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.