RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:
University professors in Pennsylvania are upset over a new law. It requires them to get fingerprinted and to undergo thorough background checks. The law was passed with widespread support after the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal. Advocates for children say the state needed tougher laws, but critics say this one goes too far. NPR's Jeff Brady reports.
JEFF BRADY, BYLINE: Former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky was convicted in 2012 of sexually abusing 10 boys. He'll likely spend the rest of his life in prison. Most of Sandusky's crimes took place off campus, but this law, enacted because of his crimes, applies to all universities. Anyone who interacts with people under 18 years old must pass a child abuse background check every three years and be fingerprinted. This includes elementary school teachers, preschool workers and college professors who might teach 17-year-old freshman.
BRIAN CURRAN: I don't consider my students to be children.
BRADY: Brian Curran is an art history professor at Penn State. He's also president of the local advocacy chapter of the American Association of University Professors. Curran says the law's intentions are good, but including college professors doesn't make sense.
CURRAN: Standing in some line and being fingerprinted - it just doesn't feel right. It seems intrusive in some sort of basic way.
BRADY: And it's expensive. Penn State expects to spend up to $3 million on this first round of fingerprints and screening. While professors have been the most vocal critics so far, the law applies to a wide range of people on campuses, from secretaries to janitors. Among the criminal convictions that would prevent someone from getting a job - prostitution, drug offenses and, of course, sexual abuse. Cathleen Palm runs the Center for Children's Justice. She says she waited decades since before the Sandusky case for strong laws in Pennsylvania to guard against child abuse. And while she likes this law, it may need some adjustment.
CATHLEEN PALM: We struck a pretty good balance the first round. We didn't clarify things enough, so now we're back trying to clarify it. There's a difference between clarifying and walking back protections.
BRADY: Pennsylvania lawmakers are debating how the language should be changed. Palm says the standard for who falls under the law should be based on the kind of contact a person has, not where it takes place.
PALM: Where there are young people who will have interaction with adults, especially unsupervised interaction, it shouldn't matter that it's a college campus. We should say we need to get those folks screened.
BRADY: This is just one of nearly two dozen changes to Pennsylvania law prompted by the Sandusky case. Attorney Janet Ginzberg, with Community Legal Services in Philadelphia, says the very definition of what is child abuse has been changed in the state.
JANET GINZBERG: These lines haven't been tested yet. I think that there are - in fact, I know of some cases where people have been charged with child abuse under the new standards, but they haven't worked their way through the courts yet.
BRADY: Ginzberg predicts years of legal battles ahead in the post-Sandusky scandal era to sort out exactly what is child abuse and who should face extra screening because they work with kids. Jeff Brady, NPR News, Philadelphia.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.