Google Makes The Case For A Hands-Off Approach To Self-Driving Cars : All Tech Considered California regulators say autonomous cars should have a licensed driver, but a top Google engineer says that makes as much sense as putting a steering wheel or brake pedal in the back of a cab.
NPR logo

Google Makes The Case For A Hands-Off Approach To Self-Driving Cars

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Google Makes The Case For A Hands-Off Approach To Self-Driving Cars

Google Makes The Case For A Hands-Off Approach To Self-Driving Cars

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript


Ask American drivers whether they want a computer to drive their car for them, and you might get an overwhelmingly negative response.





UNIDENTIFIED MAN #4: Absolutely not.


UNIDENTIFIED MAN #5: Yes, if that computer is accurate and there's no bugs in it.

SIEGEL: Well, that's what we heard from drivers this week at the nation's capital, but federal and state governments are now in the process of changing the rules to allow cars to drive themselves. And automakers aren't just asking American drivers what they think about it. Sheryl Connelly tracks global trends for Ford.

SHERYL CONNELLY: We did a study last year, and we asked people, could you imagine yourself buying or riding in a self-driving vehicle? And the two countries that came in the highest of the eight that we surveyed was India at 84 percent saying yes and China at 78 percent. Now, compare that to the U.S. and the U.K. which came in at 40 percent and 30 percent, respectively.

SIEGEL: Do you ask people whether they enjoy driving?

CONNELLY: We did not ask that question per se. We do have a theory about what explains the disparity between these markets, and I think it gets down to the joy of driving. In China and India, you have some of the most egregious congestion. You have high road fatalities, and also, I think, there is not the established emotional connection that many Westerners have with their vehicles.

SIEGEL: The Beach Boys were not an Indian or a Chinese group.

CONNELLY: They weren't.

SIEGEL: A self-driving car might not make for much of a song, but Sheryl Connelly says that it is an imperative for any auto company in the 21st century. And many automakers have been working on a gradual progression toward more and more automation in cars. Google is different. Its approach is, go straight to a fully automated, self-driving vehicle. Their model looks like a small VW bug - a two- seater. Inside, there's no steering wheel, no pedals, and it's not driving around China or India. It's driving around Mountain View, Calif. That's where Chris Urmson has led Google's car project for some time. He's currently the project's technical director. California is also where the DMV has proposed requiring a licensed driver inside. Urmson says that makes sense only for the testing period.

CHRIS URMSON: Now the software's being developed. The whole point of the system is to have someone in the vehicle who can observe and keep the thing safe. But once the technology's actually ready to be out on the road, I think that it isn't the right answer. I think the idea is to give more people mobility, and by increasing the requirements on the person who's driving the vehicle when they should be doing less doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

SIEGEL: Should somebody be able to override the controls and take over driving a self-driving car?

URMSON: It really depends what you mean by take over controls. So you wouldn't imagine that in the back of a taxi we'd put an extra steering wheel or break pedal there for the passenger to grab a hold of at any time. It would just be crazy to think about doing that. But at the same time, I could imagine that there are vehicles where most of the days, you don't really want to drive it, so let it take you to and from work in the morning, for example. But on the weekend, when you get a chance to get out onto some open road - that you might enjoy driving in that location. But I think the idea that you want the person to jump in who hasn't been paying attention or, maybe, you know, had a couple of drinks with dinner and then jump into override is probably not the right idea.

SIEGEL: Well, what about this scenario. I'm in the self-driving car on a 55-mile-per-hour speed limit road, and I notice that I'm the only car doing 55 miles per hour. Can I override to get with the flow of traffic?

URMSON: So a few years ago when we tested a freeway version of a self-driving car, we had a hundred-plus of our Google employees use the car in their daily lives to get, you know, to and from work or wherever else they were going. In those vehicles, we did put a little button that they could say, go a little bit faster. I think the cars themselves should be bound by the rule of law and should drive at the speed limit. That's why we set the speed limits, is because we think that's the safe speed for travel.

SIEGEL: Do you regard matters of insurance and liability as settled as we approach the age of the self-serving car? That is, if the person inside the car is not operating the vehicle, is Google on the hook for whatever collision the auto might contribute to?

URMSON: I don't know that settled is the right word. The question will be, once this technology is out in the market and we're seeing the benefits from it, do we want to then adjust the liability and insurance frameworks that we have much the same way that we did for vaccines and for air travel?

SIEGEL: In a TED Talk that you've given and that people can go watch, you demonstrated a wide variety of situations that the Google vehicle and tests has encountered. The strangest one is - can you just describe it? It's a woman in a wheelchair.

URMSON: Yeah. So this is actually one of the funnest videos we have, is - our car was out testing one day, and as it comes around the corner, there's a woman in an electric wheelchair with a broom in her hand chasing a duck. And she chases it, and they end up wheeling around, I suppose, in the road in a figure eight for a few moments and then run off the side of the road. And it's one of those situations that really highlights the challenges of what we're trying to do.

There's nowhere in a DMV handbook or a federal regulation what you should do when there's a woman chasing a duck in the road. And so our cars have to be able to recognize that this is a very unusual situation, let it kind of slow down, give it some space to play out because as a human watching, you have no idea what's going to happen next - and then once the road's clear, then carry on their way. And today, our cars are starting to be able to do this.

SIEGEL: You haven't built in a synthetic voice in a speaker that says, lady, get out of the road or something like that?

URMSON: No, we haven't yet. It might've been a good solution in this case but not something we've tried.

SIEGEL: Well, Chris Urmson, thanks a lot for talking with us.

URMSON: Oh, my pleasure. Thank you.

SIEGEL: Chris Urmson is technical director of Google's self-driving car project.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.