Article Outlines U.S. Plans to Bomb Iran The White House has plans for a bombing campaign that might lead to regime change in Iran, according to an article by Seymour Hersh in The New Yorker magazine. The article, "The Iran Plans" quotes sources at the Pentagon. President Bush called the story "wildly speculative."
NPR logo

Article Outlines U.S. Plans to Bomb Iran

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Article Outlines U.S. Plans to Bomb Iran

Article Outlines U.S. Plans to Bomb Iran

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript


From NPR News, this is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. I'm Michele Norris.


This morning at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, President Bush was asked whether the U.S. will allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons, and he said the U.S. does not want the Iranians to have a nuclear weapon or the capacity or knowledge to acquire one. But he said that other countries agree with Washington, and as for preventing Iran from going nuclear, this is what he said.

GEORGE W: The doctrine of prevention is to work together to prevent the Iranians from having a nuclear weapon. I know, I know we're here in Washington, you know, prevention means force. It doesn't mean force necessarily. In this case it means diplomacy. And, by the way, I read the articles in the newspapers this week and it was just wild speculation, by the way. What you're reading is wild speculation, which is kind of a, you know, happens quite frequently here in the nation's capitol.

SIEGEL: Well, one article the president was alluding to was Seymour Hersh's piece in The New Yorker magazine. It's called The Iran Plans. Seymour Hersh joins us. Welcome, once again.

SEYMOUR HERSH: Glad to be here.

SIEGEL: The subtitle of your article is Would President Bush Go to War to Stop Tehran From Getting the Bomb? And what's your answer to that question?

HERSH: Absolutely. I think there's no question. And I hope the president -- it's great news that he said it's wild speculation. Maybe he's changed his mind in the last few days. But as of last week I can tell you there are many people high up in the military and civilian bureaucracy who really don't know what he'll do but think he's prepared to go to war.

SIEGEL: What's the difference between a plan at the Pentagon which provides for the contingency that conceivably, if things don't work out, it might come to use of force against Iran, so have some plan on the shelf, and a plan that the president actually takes seriously?

HERSH: The next step would be for the president to make a decision, perhaps a warning order to the forces to start accumulating the assets, move planes around, get the bombs and ordnance, etc. in the stockpile, and then he will give an execute. So we're not near it, but this is much more than contingency planning.

SIEGEL: The White House spokesman today, in addition to calling your article wild speculation, also pointed out that the sources are anonymous. You've characterized the sources. What's the motive of somebody inside the administration or the Pentagon or close to it to start telling you anonymously about plans to bomb Iran?

HERSH: What happened is a month ago the joint chiefs tried to walk back that option. They went to the White House and said let's get it out of here because it's crazy, and they would not do so. The people in the White House, the president and vice president's office said no way.

SIEGEL: So they want the option to use tactical nuclear weapons to be on the table to be a conceivable part of the plan.

HERSH: And that's an interesting sort of red line. Nobody inside, as far as I can tell, nobody believes they're within -- the Israelis say maybe two years from developing a weapon. The American intelligence community thinks eight to ten. And so what's the rush? And that's one of the things that people on the inside are saying to me. Are we really going to go to war because they begin a small pilot project?

SIEGEL: Do you think that any of the people who shared information with you about, say, the tactical nuclear option would like to see the story out so that it might be part of a deterrent to Iran, say, let's tell the Iranians how serious President Bush is about war, regardless of how serious he might be, so that they might come down politically on the stance over nuclear weapons.

HERSH: I think the issue is there are people in the White House who don't mind stories like this because it does put the pressure on the Iranians. But the other side of that is really simple, which is Iran is not going to back off. We're in a situation where the president has set a red line. Iran has said that we're going to cross the red line. And as somebody very much a wise man said to me, he said, Sy, something bad is going to happen.

SIEGEL: Seymour Hersh, thank you very much for talking with us once again.

HERSH: Always glad to be here.

SIEGEL: Sy Hersh is the author most recently of the article in The New Yorker magazine The Iran Plans: Would President Bush Go to War to Stop Tehran From Getting the Bomb?

Copyright © 2006 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.