If E.T. Phones, Will We Hear? SETI Loses Key Funding Astronomers at the SETI Institute say California's budget crisis has forced the shutdown of the Allen Telescope Array, a powerful tool in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence.

If E.T. Phones, Will We Hear? SETI Loses Key Funding

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/136276973/136365866" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript


That effort is now running short of money, as Amy Standen of member station KQED reports.

AMY STANDEN: It takes a certain type of person to devote an entire career to chasing something she'll probably never find. One such person is Jill Tarter.

STANDEN: I'm the director of the Center for SETI Research at the SETI Institute in Mountain View, California.

STANDEN: In this scene, Ellie Arroway, Foster's character, hears the unmistakable signature of extraterrestrial intelligence over her headphones.


STANDEN: (as Ellie Arroway) Is anybody awake in there? I'm moving the array. Confirm.

STANDEN: (As Fisher) Boss has a bogey.

STANDEN: In real life, of course, the search has been a lot quieter. Tarter is in her 60s now. She wears her gray hair in a short, no-nonsense cut. She's been working on this for more than 40 years.

STANDEN: I don't know whether anyone ever will find a signal. I certainly don't know whether I will.

STANDEN: Thanks to this Allen Telescope Array, which is jointly managed with the University of California-Berkeley, SETI scientists could scan the skies full-time, hoping a clear, telltale radio signal would stand out from the universe's background hiss.

STANDEN: We're looking for signals that are compressed in frequency, because nature doesn't do that. Technology does.

STANDEN: Now, to understand SETI, you have to understand this: that we humans are a very young species on a very young planet, and we've only had modern technology for the last couple hundred years. Tarter says it's a cosmic blip.

STANDEN: Our galaxy is 10 billion years old. And most of the stars in our region of the galaxy are about a billion years older than our sun.

STANDEN: In this broader scope of cosmic time, we humans are practically newborns.

STANDEN: We don't know if there are any other technologies out there. But if there are, we can be pretty sure they're older and more capable than we are.

STANDEN: Capable, she hopes, of beaming high-power radio waves that our telescopes could eventually pick up. But this is a long shot, perhaps the longest long shot in science, says Caleb Scharf, director of Astrobiology at Columbia University.

P: All of those arguments ultimately rest on big assumptions that tend to be very human-centric.

STANDEN: For instance, that another civilization would use radio signals at all or would have any interest in finding us. And then there's there problem of timing.

P: Even if there were many, many technological civilizations in our galaxy, the chances of one of them being radio loud...

STANDEN: Prof. SCHARF ...right at this instant, right at the time that we have the right technology to listen for it, the odds seem to shrink a lot.

STANDEN: But recently, something happened that gave those odds a modest boost.

U: Engines start. One, zero and liftoff of the Delta-2 Rocket with Kepler on a search for planets in some way like our own.

STANDEN: NASA's Kepler Telescope found signs of what it was looking for, dozens of possible planets that might be similar to Earth, orbiting distant stars like our sun.

P: Some of these are potentially habitable planets.

STANDEN: Dimitar Sasselov is on the Kepler team. He also directs Harvard's Origins of Life Initiative.

P: This is where we should be looking for the signals coming from other civilizations to start with. SETI is already in possession of that list.

STANDEN: Jill Tarter says she's frustrated by the holdup.

STANDEN: Never before have we known such good potential targets at which to point our telescopes. And that's what we want to do.

STANDEN: Tarter wants to raise $5 million in private money to search the Kepler planets. Caleb Scharf, the Columbia astrobiologist we heard from earlier, says he thinks that's a bargain. Sure, SETI is a long shot, but science needs long shots.

P: Too often in modern science, we kind of narrow down our vision. We narrow down what we want to look at a little too much.

STANDEN: SETI, on the other hand, swings for the fences. The money may never pay off, says Scharf, but we'll never know unless we try.

P: I think the best argument for SETI is simply that we do not know. The only real solution is to look and to look in as broad a way as you can.

STANDEN: For NPR News, I'm Amy Standen in San Francisco.

Copyright © 2011 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.