Tina Brown's Must-Reads: The Columnist's Voice Daily Beast and Newsweek editor Tina Brown explores the work of newspaper columnists through readings that propose a new way of looking at the 2012 election and the scandal at Penn State.

Tina Brown's Must-Reads: The Columnist's Voice

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/142650556/142693159" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript


Tina Brown joins us on this day before Thanksgiving. She comes to us regularly as the editor of Newsweek and The Daily Beast with reading recommendations that we talk about. We call it Word of Mouth. We'll hear about some things we can read over this long holiday weekend. Hi Tina.

TINA BROWN: Good morning, Steve. How are you?

INSKEEP: I'm doing great, thank you very much. Happy Thanksgiving to you.

BROWN: And to you.

INSKEEP: And we're going to be talking about newspaper columnists here. And we're going to talk about some really interesting columns, present and past. And let's begin with the present and Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan whose column here is headlined "A Caveman Won't Beat A Salesman." What does she mean?

BROWN: Well, what is great about Peggy Noonan is she has a brilliant way of being able to pivot off a conversational point of something that's she's heard and then work it out into an interesting and different kind of denumerable. And she starts by coming off the Steve Job's book by Walter Isaacson, where she notes that Steve makes a very interesting comment about why a decline happens at great companies.

And he says the company does a great job, innovates and becomes a monopoly or close to it in some field, and then the quality of the product becomes less important. And he says that, you know, salesmen take over and the actual quality of the product kind of gets marginalized. You know, that's where the rot sets in.

And then he goes on to discuss the president, and he talks about how the president, he's very smart, but he can't explain to us reasons why things can't get done. And Peggy really pivots off of that and says, you know, Obama in her mind, was also a salesman who really didn't understand in a sense the quality of the product, in which case, you know, America.

And she goes even further and she talks about how Herman Cain is also, therefore, you know, an embarrassment to America, because Herman Cain also doesn't kind of respect the product - in this case politics, the democracy, the way that, you know, the body politic runs. Well, he just simply cannot answer a question about what he feels about what the president did in Libya. And literally, as she writes, you know, kind of gropes for his soundbite and can't find it. And that's why he's brain-freezed.

And she says that this disrespect for the democratic process, this misunderstanding of what politics is, in a sense, and what running for office means does an enormous disservice to the GOP because it makes people feel that the GOP runners are in fact, you know, disrespectful of the process; are in fact, you know, not able to do it intellectually, and have no ability to govern.

INSKEEP: She starts by criticizing President Obama, but ends up criticizing her own party. She says Republicans are skeptical of government. They're right to be skeptical of excessive power of government, but that their candidates and a lot of voters have ended up cheering the notion that you don't even need to know what you're doing.

BROWN: Exactly right. I think it's a terrific piece. And, you know, you'd never expect she'd get there from the way she starts. But a very interesting point of view, and, of course, you know, Cain did it again when he said, you know, that he thought the Taliban might take over in Libya. I mean, you know, this guy, it seems, doesn't even read the newspapers.

INSKEEP: So let's move on to another column here. This is by New York Times columnist David Brooks, and he is taking a second look at the way we have perceived the Penn State scandal, the arrest of a former assistant coach on sexual abuse charges and the related incidences.

BROWN: Yes, well he talks very, very interestingly, I think, about this whole case that's so fascinating to people. He says, you know, the vanity is the outraged reaction of a zillion commentators over the past week, whose indignation is based on the assumption that they had been in Paterno's shoes, or McQueary's shoes, they would have behaved better.

And he goes on to argue that actually, unfortunately, the evidence of history and of society is that that doesn't happen - of course, most classically during the holocaust. But he says some people can't process the horror in front of them. Some people suffer from what psychologists call normalcy bias when they find themselves in an unsettling circumstance - they shut down and they just pretend that everything is normal. Which, of course, you know, one sees a great deal.

But he also says that people suffer from motivated blindness when they don't see what's not in their interest to see. And of course, that has been shown, tremendously, in some of the fallout from this Paterno case.

INSKEEP: You mentioned McQueary. Of course you're talking about Mike McQueary, the assistant coach who discovered, allegedly, Jerry Sandusky abusing a child inside the Penn State locker room and either did nothing or did not do enough, depending on whose account you believe. This is the person classically that people say, well, if I was there of course I would have stopped it. Brooks says don't be so sure of yourself.

BROWN: That's right. He says not necessarily so. I mean they could have suffered from either the normalcy bias that he writes about, or motivated blindness. And he also then talks about the bystander effect, and he says, so many people do nothing while witnessing ongoing crimes that psychologists have given it that name: the bystander effect. The more people are around to witness the crime, the less likely, in fact, they are to intervene.

INSKEEP: You know, there's a line in this column, people are really good at self-deception. And your next reading, your next recommended reading here, is a book full of columnists who try to get us to take a second and clearer look at things.

BROWN: Yes, I love this book. It's called "Deadline Artists: America's Greatest Newspaper Columns," edited by John Avlon and Jesse Angelo and Errol Louis. And, you know, for a sort of newspaper, magazine, and online junkie like myself, to read these collective columns that they've taken, you know, over many, many years, you know, divided them into sections of humor and war and sports, hard times, crime - there's some wonderful bylines in here that weren't just as forgotten like Damon Runyon, some of the great columns of Mike Royko, of Pete Hamill, of the wonderful, wonderful Jimmy Breslin.

And they say in the introduction, that the columnist speaks in a voice that readers understand, their own, but just a bit better, a voice that comforts and confronts. A great column is both a witness and work of art, helping people understand the world around them and making them feel a little less alone.

And I think that's absolutely right. I mean I think that the best of these columns are really telling a little story. They're about reporting. They're about really telling, you know, human detail, let's fill the notebook.

And Avlon and his co-writers make the point that, you know, in the era of the kind of fast, sort of internet kind of punditry, in a sense, the art of the reported column where the writer actually goes out and tells a little vivid story that adds kind of moral dimension to the way we look at the world, is becoming some what kind of marginalized. And this is a way for us to look at these kinds of writings and say, you know, there's something here to compete with. There's something here we can really revive in our approach to newspaper columns, and indeed, internet columns.

INSKEEP: We should mention, John Avlon is the guy who works for you at The Daily Beast.

BROWN: Indeed he does.

INSKEEP: You, of course, have hired and perhaps fired a few columnists over the years at different publications. What quality of mind or what quality of writing do you see that makes a columnist last and stick in people's minds?

BROWN: I think it's really about how they think and their ability to empathize in a unique and interpretive way, in a sense, with both their readers and the culture. You know, you really want to feel that the writer is both absolutely in tune with what's happening in the culture, but also has a kind of counterintuitive response to it that goes against the grain, but at the same time is something that you can really, really identify with.

And I think Hamill, Pete Hamill is one of the great columnists actually. He wrote incredible material during 9/11 covering, in absolutely vivid detail, from a point of view of his own trek through the streets of Manhattan.

He said I start running toward Broadway, through dust two inches deep. Park Row is white. City Hall Park is white. Sheets of paper are scattered everywhere, orders for stocks, waybills, purchase orders, the pulverized confetti of capitalism.

I thought that was a brilliant way of describing it. And he wrote that on a dime. I mean, he was writing it in the mayhem of that day. That's what one has to remember. These columns were written in the mayhem of the day when there would have been no time to look at what other people were writing or think about it or marinate on it. And it was simply what he wrote with pure, pure vision and eyes and heart. And it reads that way to this day.

INSKEEP: Tina, it's always a pleasure talking with you.

BROWN: Thank you.

INSKEEP: Word of Mouth from Tina Brown, editor of Newsweek and The Daily Beast.


INSKEEP: This is NPR News.

Copyright © 2011 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.