Mug Shot Websites Charge When You're Charged, For Now : The Two-Way If you've been arrested in the last 10 years, there's a good chance your arrest photo ended up on any number of websites. You'll have to pay to make them take it down, but one lawyer aims to make the websites pay instead.
NPR logo

Mug Shot Websites Charge When You're Charged, For Now

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Mug Shot Websites Charge When You're Charged, For Now

Mug Shot Websites Charge When You're Charged, For Now

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript


A little more than a year ago, Debbie Jo Lashaway was charged with theft. She was arraigned and booked in Lucas County, Ohio, and her mug shot was taken. And then seven months later, the charges were dropped and her record was cleared. She even won a judgment against the man who accused her of theft.

But just a few weeks ago, she found out her mug shot was still online. It was posted on a handful of websites, sites like and And to have them removed, she'd have to pay those sites between 150 and $500. So she called her lawyer, Scott Ciolek. And Ciolek decided to file a class action lawsuit against those companies.

SCOTT CIOLEK: The lawsuit that we filed in Ohio challenges these websites on the grounds of publicity rights. And that's like a patent or copyright that an individual has in their own persona. And although they are public records and there are exceptions made for newsworthy and public affairs, commercial use of someone's persona without their permission is an infringement of their publicity rights.

RAZ: What if they weren't charging money to remove the photographs? What if they were just showing the photographs and that was it?

CIOLEK: Hypothetically speaking, if a company were to just have an archive of all the arrested people and they put them to no commercial use but they were just available for the public inspection, that would take it outside the rights of publicity.

RAZ: Let's say you pay one of these companies and you pay them to remove your mug shot. Do you have to pay them all?

CIOLEK: Yes. We've gotten a number of reports back from individuals who found that once they paid one website the next week they'd find their picture on two different websites. And because they're officially not affiliated, they have to pay off the other two websites.

RAZ: Now, what if, you know, say, I'm a law-abiding citizen. I've never been arrested or had a mug shot taken of me. Why should I care if mug shots are being posted online?

CIOLEK: What we're talking about in my case is property rights. No matter if you've got a lot of money in a house or if you owe nothing, you still have rights to control how your image is being used in a commercial purpose. And everyone has that right. So when websites like this are chipping away at the value of that right, they'd chip away at the value for everyone.

RAZ: So if you are arrested and a mug shot is taken of you and then you are later proven to be innocent, that mug shot is not wiped from a database?

CIOLEK: There are hundreds of stories we've received since we filed the lawsuit two weeks ago about people who have been totally exonerated of all crimes. And their mug shots are as present today on these websites as people that are guilty of very serious crimes.

RAZ: And presumably, this affects their job prospects and other things like that.

CIOLEK: Invariably, it's not a very flattering picture. And generally, the crimes they're accused of are posted right next to their picture with their name. And they find it very difficult finding employment or finding people to rent them space for offices or to give them a place to live.

RAZ: You want to turn this into a class action suit. How big could this get?

CIOLEK: We have identified at least 250,000 people in Ohio who are being exploited by these various websites. I've received emails and other correspondences from all over the country where people are talking about this same problem. So I'm hoping that the template that I've kind of laid out in the Ohio class action will be copied by attorneys all over the country with similar rights to publicity so we can completely eradicate this for the Web.

RAZ: That's Scott Ciolek. He's a lawyer representing a class action lawsuit against websites that publish mug shots online. Scott Ciolek, thank you.

CIOLEK: Oh, thank you, Guy.

Copyright © 2012 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.