A Blood Test Can Detect Cancers, But Isn't Ready For Prime Time : Shots - Health News This blood test detected signs of cancer in 70 percent of people with eight common forms of the disease. But it was much less good at identifying cancer in people in the early stages.

Scientists Edge Closer To A Blood Test To Detect Cancers

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/578620342/578957021" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript


Imagine a blood test that would detect eight common cancers possibly even before symptoms appear. Scientists say they've taken a step that could eventually lead to such a test. They envision someday a $500 test that screens for cancer even if in its early stages, when it's most treatable. NPR's Richard Harris reports on the challenges these scientists face.

RICHARD HARRIS, BYLINE: There have been many attempts over the decades to develop blood tests to screen for cancers. Some look for proteins in the blood that appear with cancers. Others more recently focused on DNA from tumors. But these methods aren't reliable, so Nick Papadopoulos at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center and many prominent colleagues are trying a new approach - combining these two methods into one test.

NICK PAPADOPOULOS: We used the DNA, looking at mutations of the DNA that comes from cancer cells and also the levels of proteins that they come from cancer cells.

HARRIS: Their experimental test targets eight major cancers - lung, breast, colon, pancreas, liver, stomach, ovary and esophagus.

PAPADOPOULOS: We selected those eight cancers based on how frequent they are and also that a lot of them do not have any screening modality right now.

HARRIS: They studied about a thousand people who had been diagnosed with those cancers. The blood test found signs of cancer in about 70 percent. They also studied more than 800 people without cancer diagnoses and found just seven - less than 1 percent - who apparently had a false reading. Of course the ultimate goal of this test is to find cancer in people who haven't been diagnosed. So Papadopoulos says the success rate could well be lower.

PAPADOPOULOS: Maybe it's not going to be 70 percent. Maybe it's going to be less. But we still think that this is a very important milestone to try to be able to detect cancers in asymptomatic people. That could save their life.

HARRIS: The test doesn't always pinpoint the source of the cancer, but Papadopoulos says about two-thirds of the time, the test results help doctors home in on the site of the tumor. Vinay Prasad, an oncologist and cancer researcher at the Oregon Health and Science University, is reserving his enthusing for this work.

VINAY PRASAD: We've come about one step in a thousand-mile journey.

HARRIS: First the Hopkins team will need to demonstrate that the test will be useful in patients without symptoms. Then they'll need to show that the rate of false alarms remains very low. Otherwise people will be sent on needless and expensive medical odysseys.

PRASAD: You've got to find cancer that's going to otherwise be lethal and not cancer that would otherwise be destined to do nothing.

HARRIS: That's been a huge problem with previous cancer screening tests, especially for prostate cancer and breast cancer, and has led to pointless and potentially dangerous treatments, he says. An effective screening test holds lots of potential for cancer patients, Prasad says.

PRASAD: So we want this to be true. We hope that this is true. But we have learned through 30, 40, 50 years of cancer screening that we have to do the right studies at the outset to know that it's true.

HARRIS: The scientists at Hopkins have already launched their next study, which could involve tens of thousands of apparently healthy patients to answer the next big question, which is whether it will pick up cancer in people who don't have symptoms. If that multi-year experiment succeeds, the researchers will still have to demonstrate that the test improves and extends the lives of cancer patients. Papadopoulos is less concerned that the test could detect cancers that turn out to be harmless.

PAPADOPOULOS: In a personal level, I do want to know. That doesn't mean that I have to go and have a surgery. However, I still think this is a very useful information knowing that something is happening and follow it up.

HARRIS: In any event, dealing with that concern is at best many years away. Richard Harris, NPR News.


Copyright © 2018 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.