Supreme Court Limits Asset Forfeiture, Rules Excessive Fines Apply To States Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion and announced it on just her second day back at court after surgery for lung cancer late last year.

Law

Supreme Court Limits Civil Asset Forfeiture, Rules Excessive Fines Apply To States

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/696360090/696532435" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

DAVID GREENE, HOST:

This week, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg seems intent on showing the world that she is back - back from lung cancer surgery in late December, back after missing six days of oral arguments in early January and back being a player, even if she is in the court's liberal minority. NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg has more.

NINA TOTENBERG, BYLINE: On Tuesday, as the court returned from a midwinter break, Ginsburg was on the bench and the first to ask a question during oral arguments. The tiny, 85-year-old justice even seemed to sit straighter in her seat. On Wednesday, Ginsburg was in the public eye again, announcing an opinion, declaring for the first time that the Constitution's ban on excessive fines applies not just to the federal government but to state and local governments as well.

The unanimous ruling could have a significant impact on some parts of the country, where hefty fines are imposed to raise money to fund local governments, something that the court seemed to say is forbidden. The court's ruling came in the case of Tyson Timbs, whose $42,000 Land Rover was seized by the state of Indiana after he was arrested for selling a small amount of heroin to undercover cops for $400.

TYSON TIMBS: They took my truck immediately. They took that the night that I was arrested. And they've had it ever since.

TOTENBERG: After a trial judge ruled the fine grossly disproportionate to the offense, the state Supreme Court ruled that didn't matter because it said the ban on excessive fines does not apply to the states. On Wednesday, however, the U.S. Supreme Court disagreed. Writing for the court, Justice Ginsburg noted that the Founding Fathers adopted the excessive fines ban for good reason. It has been a constant shield against those who, in the past, have used it to punish political enemies or to raise revenues, she said.

Indeed, she observed, one of the reasons the 14th Amendment was enacted after the Civil War was to nullify the laws adopted in many southern states that imposed big fines on newly freed slaves - fines they could not pay, thus forcing them into involuntary labor. Nina Totenberg, NPR News, Washington.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.