Electronic Health Records' Side Effects: Fraud, Burnout And Headaches : Shots - Health News The government used a 2009 financial stimulus package to move the country from paper medical charts to electronic records. Care was supposed to get better, safer and cheaper. It hasn't worked out.
NPR logo

Why The Promise Of Electronic Health Records Has Gone Unfulfilled

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/704475396/704562489" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Why The Promise Of Electronic Health Records Has Gone Unfulfilled

Why The Promise Of Electronic Health Records Has Gone Unfulfilled

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/704475396/704562489" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript


If you have ever had an appointment where your doctor spent most of the time looking at a computer screen and typing, you have electronic medical records to thank for that. The switch from paper charts was supposed to be a great thing for doctors, for hospitals and for us patients - for the whole health care system - so much so that the federal government backed the transition, even subsidizing new computer systems for doctors' offices.

Well, 10 years and $36 billion later, this digital revolution has not gone to plan. With me now to talk about the findings is reporter Fred Schulte of Kaiser Health News. He co-wrote the story along with Erika Fry of Fortune magazine, and he's in our studio. Welcome.

FRED SCHULTE: Great to be here.

KELLY: I guess what is so staggering about your findings is that it's not just a hassle. It's not just an inconvenience. It's actually causing risks to patients' safety, and even deaths. What did you find?

SCHULTE: Yes, well, there've been thousands of incidents that have been reported of near misses, of injuries and some deaths that have - have happened because of software glitches or other problems. Sometimes it's very difficult to figure out exactly what went wrong. Sometimes it's a user error, where the company will say, well, the doctor didn't type it in right. Or he pulled down a menu, and he took the wrong item.

Other times, a test will be ordered by the doctor, and it just disappears, and it never gets sent to the lab. And so they could be waiting around for a test and not realize the result isn't coming, and that could result in an injury.

KELLY: Can you tell me one story, one anecdote that would illuminate how digital records have complicated things?

SCHULTE: Right, well, we wrote about a number of patients. But one in particular had really, really bad, severe headaches. And so she was living in Vermont. And she went to the doctor, and the doctor ordered the test that would try to get to the root of that. Well, that was a case in which it disappeared. It never was done, and she died later of a brain aneurysm.

KELLY: There are also cost implications to this and concerns that the software can be misused. You describe a practice known as upcoding. Explain.

SCHULTE: Yes, upcoding is basically charging for services that you didn't fully render. One of the things that doctors both can, in some cases, take advantage of and also complain about is that the electronic health record tends to copy and paste over and over again. And so it gets very voluminous. But one of the things it can also do is it can copy material from an earlier visit, forward it into the current visit and make it look as if the doctor had, in fact, done a lot of services that were not done. That's a problem.

KELLY: We've been talking a lot about how all this looks from the patient's perspective. What about from the doctors' perspective? There was a number that leapt out at me from your report of doctors who were describing 4,000 mouse clicks per shift, just trying to get through all the electronic documentation...


KELLY: ...They're being asked to do.

SCHULTE: Right, that was one study of an average shift for an emergency room doctor. And, of course...

KELLY: They're going to need medical treatment themselves...

SCHULTE: Yeah, well...

KELLY: ...For their carpal tunnel syndrome after all that.

SCHULTE: Yeah, it could be. It also - if you click 4,000 times, I mean, the idea that you might make a mistake once, you know, is not too hard to believe.

KELLY: So is one takeaway here that we, as patients and consumers of health care, just need to be a lot more vigilant about policing our records?

SCHULTE: Well, absolutely. I think one poll recently found that when people actually asked for and got copies of their health care records, 1 out of 5 people found some sort of error in there that, in some cases, could be a serious problem. So you absolutely need to check this out.

KELLY: So what is the alternative, go back to paper?


KELLY: Where do we go?

SCHULTE: I mean, I don't think anybody suggests going back to paper. The probable solution is that everybody working together in the best interest of the patients in order to make the health system better. But you have...

KELLY: I guess the question is, what's the incentive? What's - what would be driving that?

SCHULTE: Well, there isn't a lot of incentive to work together because big tech companies want to sell software, and they compete with one another. And, you know, they don't want to share a lot of information. You have to drag them sort of kicking and screaming to doing this. And I think that's what's going to be happening.

KELLY: Fred Schulte of Kaiser Health News, thanks so much for coming in.

SCHULTE: My pleasure.

Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.