STEVE INSKEEP, Host:
Now let's look at the effort to stop what the U.S. regards as interference inside Iraq. According to a top State Department official, the interference comes from nearby Iran. In recent days the U.S. has captured Iranian agents in Iraq and Nicholas Burns says they've been directly linked to attacks on Americans.
NICHOLAS BURNS: We have picked up individuals who we believe are giving very sophisticated explosive technology to Shia insurgent groups, who then use that technology to target and kill American soldiers. This is a very serious situation, and the message from the United States is Iran should cease and desist.
INSKEEP: Have you linked Iranian involvement to a specific incident or operation?
BURNS: Now, we warned Iran privately on a number of occasions over the last year and a half, and the Iranians of course did not appear to listen to that. So now we've begun to detain those Iranian officials. And we think it's absolutely within our rights to do so under Article 51 of the U.N. Charter, which is self-defense. Iran should not seek this type of role in Iraq. It should try to become a force for unity in Iraq itself, but it's not choosing that path right now.
INSKEEP: There's been much interest in a particular incident in recent days near the city of Karbala, where a number of insurgents in U.S. military uniforms - what looked like them, anyway - got past a number of checkpoints and were involved in a gunfight in which a number of Americans were killed. Do you believe Iran had a role in that specific incident?
BURNS: That was a despicable event, and we did lose five young Americans in that attack. We don't know who was responsible. That's under investigation.
INSKEEP: Are you looking at Iran?
BURNS: You know, Steve, it's hard to say. I don't want to say anything that would be inaccurate. And obviously we're looking at all sources and we'll try to find those who are responsible and hold them accountable. But right now it's not possible to say exactly who those people were. But the larger point is this. Iran is seeking a position of dominance in the Middle East. It's very clear. Iran has a regional agenda, which is very much at odds with that of the United States.
INSKEEP: Mr. Burns, you mentioned that the United States has the right of self-defense here. Does that right of self-defense give the United States the right to strike targets within Iran in response to this should the president choose to do so?
BURNS: So there is a clear legal and I would say political and moral difference between what the United States is doing - which is to try to unify Iraq and bring the country to a greater measure of stability - and what the Iranians are doing.
INSKEEP: I just want to clarify something here. President Bush, in an interview with NPR earlier this week, said that the United States did not intend to invade Iran. Are you saying the United States does not intend to strike Iran in any way, which I suppose would say you don't intend an air strike or any other kind of military operation?
BURNS: Well, you know, we have said for a number of years that all options are on the table concerning Iran. But we've also said very clearly - and we've followed this very assiduously - that we're on a diplomatic path. We believe it can be resolved by diplomatic means.
INSKEEP: But I want to understand which of those statements is operative. You don't intend to invade or you don't intend to strike, given this particular context?
BURNS: We've been very clear we don't intend to cross the border into Iran, we don't intend to strike into Iran, in terms of what we are doing in Iraq.
INSKEEP: In terms of what you're doing in Iraq.
INSKEEP: All options may be on the table with other issues, like Iran's nuclear program.
BURNS: Well, that's been American policy for many, many years. In fact, that predates the Bush administration.
INSKEEP: Mr. Burns, one other question. On this program, we heard from Professor Ali Ansari, director of the Institute of Iranian Studies at Scotland's St. Andrews University. He was talking about the consequences of this confrontation. And he said, this is a quote, "By raising the tension and by raising the level of armed forces in the region, even if both sides are not interested in military conflict, you're increasing the likelihood that an accidental escalation is going to take place." Is there any truth in that?
BURNS: We're simply trying to protect our interests in Iraq, the security of the Gulf Arab states and of the wider Middle East. And this has been the American position now through many administrations. And the Iranians need to understand they can't come barging into a situation and express what they want and seek a position of dominance without some kind of reaction from the moderate Arab states and from the United States. We're trying to convince the Iranians that it's in their best interest to sit down and talk with the United States. That is the basis of American policy.
INSKEEP: Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns, thanks very much for speaking with us.
BURNS: Thank you, Steve.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.