At 94, Director Peter Brook Is Still At It The iconic British director has a new work on stage in New York; Why? asks exactly that question about the purpose of theater in society. Brook says he'll carry on as long as he can find the energy.
NPR logo

At 94, Director Peter Brook Is Still Asking The Deep Questions

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
At 94, Director Peter Brook Is Still Asking The Deep Questions

At 94, Director Peter Brook Is Still Asking The Deep Questions

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript


At the age of 94, director and author Peter Brook can genuinely be called a living legend. His career has stretched for over seven decades, from groundbreaking productions of Shakespeare to his nine-hour adaptation of the Sanskrit epic "The Mahabharata."

His latest work is now onstage in Brooklyn. It's called "Why?" And as Jeff Lunden reports, it asks that question about the very profession Peter Brook has spent his life exploring.

JEFF LUNDEN, BYLINE: Peter Brook has been in love with theater for as long as he can remember. As a boy in London, his Russian-born parents took him to plays. And he even staged "Hamlet" for them in a toy theater with cut-out figures when he was 10.

PETER BROOK: And the poor things sat there for about two hours while I read, with one hand, the text. And with the other hand, I did these maneuvers. I can't imagine the torture - this tiny voice reading badly and saying, to be or not to be, that is - (laughter).

LUNDEN: By the time he was in his 20s, he was staging Shakespeare in Stratford with the finest actors of the day - John Gielgud, Vivien Leigh, Paul Scofield.


PAUL SCOFIELD: (As Hamlet) To be or not to be, that is the question.

LUNDEN: But even back then, Peter Brook found himself asking why there wasn't another way to create theater. He wrote a book in 1968 called "The Empty Space," which begins, quote, "I can take any empty space and call it a bare stage."

BROOK: When you talk about "The Empty Space," like I sometimes say to people, you know, don't bother to read the book. Read the title 'cause if one really thinks of it, this is a call to a question, to say why and, bit by bit, get rid of all the established trappings of scenery, of costume, of music. All that has to be questioned.

LUNDEN: And true to that aesthetic in Brook's latest work, the stage is bare, save for a large carpet, some chairs and three actors all dressed in black.


MARCELLO MAGNI: (As character) Why do we do theater?

HAYLEY CARMICHAEL: (As character) Why do we do it?

KATHRYN HUNTER: (As character) Why? What is it all about? What's it for?

LUNDEN: Brook's ceaseless questioning led him to establish the International Center for Theatre Research in Paris, where he and his principal collaborator Marie-Helene Estienne have been reinvestigating classics and devising new works with actors from around the globe for over 40 years.

BROOK: As Shakespeare says always, there is a world elsewhere. And in seeing that, I found that a mixture going beyond racial barriers and then going beyond national barriers, language barriers, cultural barriers - something opens. So this is a never-ending process.

LUNDEN: Brook uses that approach to ask who we are and why we do things to each other. In 1975, he staged "The Ik" about an African tribe that starved to death because it was forced from its land.

KAREN BROOKS HOPKINS: He took on this issue in the most profound, deepest way imaginable.

LUNDEN: Karen Brooks Hopkins saw it in grad school. She's executive producer of Peter Brook/NY, which is sponsoring events across the city exploring the 94-year-old director's work.

BROOKS HOPKINS: And I never thought or understood that theater could be so essential, so powerful and just so right on in terms of getting straight to the heart of something.

LUNDEN: In his latest piece, Peter Brook investigates the questioning work of some of his predecessors, notably director Vsevolod Meyerhold, who was swept up in the Russian Revolution but ultimately denounced, imprisoned and murdered by Stalin's regime.

BROOK: And he was sitting there in his cell - it's terrifying to think of - saying, have I made mistakes? Is this all my fault? His honesty means that he's also saying, but why? Why are they saying that I'm an enemy of the revolution? Why do they want to get rid of me? Why am I in prison? Bang.

LUNDEN: In "Why?," actress Kathryn Hunter quotes Meyerhold, answering those questions.


HUNTER: (As character) Theater is a very dangerous weapon. Imagine you are prescribed 0.005 milligrams of strychnine to take a day, and you swallow the whole bottle in one mouthful. Theater is dynamite, more dangerous than fire, more dangerous than bombs.

LUNDEN: Because, says actor Marcello Magni, who's worked on several of Brook's pieces, theater can shine a light on the world we live in.

MAGNI: In the theater, there is a world. But Peter is constantly doing left and right, looks and up and down and behind and sideways to life in order to look at theater.

LUNDEN: At 94, Peter Brook is growing increasingly frail, yet he continues to explore.

BROOK: If life has brought you to this, you have an obligation to try to carry on as long as you can find the energy.

LUNDEN: And that is not in question.

For NPR News, I'm Jeff Lunden in New York.


Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.