TERRY GROSS, HOST:
This is FRESH AIR. Daniel Mendelsohn is a busy man. He's the editor at large of The New York Review of Books and writes frequently for that publication as well as for The New Yorker. He also teaches literature at Bard College and writes books, the latest of which is a collection of 20 of his more recent essays called "Ecstasy And Terror." Book critic Maureen Corrigan has a review.
MAUREEN CORRIGAN, BYLINE: This past summer I made time to catch up on a book I'd missed when it was published two years ago. Ever since, I've been telling friends, students and random strangers on a train that they must read Daniel Mendelsohn's memoir, called "An Odyssey." In it, he recalls teaching a seminar on Homer's "Odyssey" that his then-81-year-old father sat in on as an auditor. "An Odyssey" is the best account of what teaching is really like that I've ever read. It's also, like Homer's epic, a spellbinding story about the tenderness of a father-son bond as well as the inevitable limits that one's own personality and mortality impose on that bond.
Mendelsohn has just brought out a new book called "Ecstasy And Terror." The topics here range from a rumination on the mystery of one of the world's most famous buildings, the Parthenon, to the unconsciously mythic underpinnings of the ways America continues to try to make sense of the JFK assassination. In the final essay, called "A Critic's Manifesto," Mendelsohn recalls why he fled the theory-encrypted halls of academe after getting his Ph.D. in classics. He yearned to become a critic who writes for a wide audience, although as Mendelsohn cheerfully admits, his writing characteristically cross-pollinates the classics with contemporary popular culture.
Lots of critics routinely make light references to Greek myth and literature, but in Mendelsohn's writing, such connections mean something. They illuminate more than his own glibness. For instance, in a 2013 essay for The New Yorker called "Unburied," Mendelsohn reflects on the controversy over what to do with the body of the Boston Marathon bomber, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, a cadaver seemingly so morally polluted that no cemetery would bury it. Prodded by the arguments of Sophocles' tragedy "Antigone" in particular, Mendelsohn arrives at the controversial conclusion that calling Tsarnaev a monster, as some residents of the Virginia town where he's finally buried are doing, is inaccurate.
To call him a monster, Mendelsohn says, is to treat this enemy's mind the way some would treat his unburied body, which is to say, to put it beyond the reach of human consideration and therefore, paradoxically, to refuse to confront his monstrosity at all. As that essay shows, Mendelsohn's grounding in the classics gives a larger reach to his essays beyond the news of the day. In his scope and suppleness as a writer, Mendelsohn is a living answer to the question, what will a degree in classics do for you?
The one flat essay in this collection is unfortunately the one readers won't need to be sold on, namely the "Game Of Thrones" essay. Called "The Women And The Thrones," it's off in its sense of audience, containing so much plot summary that devotees of the show will be bored and non-initiates will be numbed. Mendelsohn's rare fail makes you appreciate just how hard it is to pull off his distinctive blend of storytelling energy, erudition and emotional resonance.
Nowhere is that charm triad more in evidence than in the final, autobiographical section of this collection. Two of the essays here are nuanced tributes to two older women who were unlikely mentors to him. One was Mary Renault, a once-famous writer of historical novels set in ancient Greece. As a teenager, Mendelsohn recalls he read "Fire From Heaven," a novel about Alexander the Great, and was moved to write a letter to Renault, thus starting a correspondence that would last years. Mendelsohn, who is gay, also recalls that, Alexander the Great was my first serious crush.
And that last essay about becoming a critic is a must-read in this age where expertise is so often airily dismissed. Thinking about the critics he worshipfully read in the New Yorker as a teenager, among them Helen Vendler and Pauline Kael, Mendelsohn says, I thought of these writers above all as teachers, and like all good teachers, they taught by example. The example they set week after week was to recreate on the page the drama of how they had arrived at their judgments. Even when you disagreed with them, their judgments had authority because they were grounded in something more concrete, more available to other people than feelings or impressions.
Mendelsohn, of course, could be talking about the source of his own hard-earned authority as a critic. To read a signature Mendelsohn essay is to be educated and entertained and always freshly aware of how much more there is to read and know.
GROSS: Maureen Corrigan teaches literature at Georgetown University. She reviewed "Ecstasy And Terror" by Daniel Mendelsohn. Tomorrow on FRESH AIR, as concerns rise about the possible resurgence of ISIS, we'll get a firsthand account of the 2017 battle to drive the terrorist group from Mosul, Iraq's second largest city. Our guest will be journalist James Verini, author of the new book "They Will Have To Die Now." He'll tell us about the initial appeal of ISIS to the city's residents and the effects of the savage fighting on civilians. I hope you'll join us.
(SOUNDBITE OF MATT ULERY'S LOOM'S "OVER UNDER OTHER")
GROSS: FRESH AIR's executive producer is Danny Miller. Our senior producer today is Roberta Shorrock. Our interviews and reviews are produced and edited by Amy Salit, Phyllis Myers, Sam Briger, Lauren Krenzel, Ann Marie Baldonado, Mooj Zadie, Seth Kelley and Joel Wolfram. Therese Madden directed today's show. I'm Terry Gross.
(SOUNDBITE OF MATT ULERY'S LOOM'S "OVER UNDER OTHER")
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.