Whither The Deficit Hawk: Changing Attitudes On Budget Red Ink Among The GOP William Hoagland, who for years helped shape GOP budget policy, says the public just doesn't see rising deficits as a major issue at a time when the economy is doing well.
NPR logo

Whither The Deficit Hawk: Changing Attitudes On Budget Red Ink Among The GOP

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/804903424/805002933" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Whither The Deficit Hawk: Changing Attitudes On Budget Red Ink Among The GOP

Whither The Deficit Hawk: Changing Attitudes On Budget Red Ink Among The GOP

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/804903424/805002933" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript


There was a time when congressional Republicans railed against the budget deficit.


MICK MULVANEY: One of the most disappointing experiences I have as a politician - or anybody who even follows politics - was how poorly the Republican majority and the White House handled spending issues in the growth of government.

JOHN BOEHNER: The United States cannot default on its debt obligations. The jobs and savings of too many Americans are at stake.

PAUL RYAN: We owe it to our children and grandchildren to give them a budget that pays off the national debt.

CORNISH: The familiar voices of now acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney and former House Speakers John Boehner and Paul Ryan. Boehner and Ryan have left Washington. Mulvaney now also leads the Office of Management and Budget. And yet the deficit has soared under President Trump, and the proposal he unveiled yesterday is no match for it. It envisions closing the deficit by 2035.

William Hoagland was a Republican staffer on the Senate Budget Committee for years. I asked him to assess President Trump's plan.

WILLIAM HOAGLAND: His goal I enjoy. I do believe deficits matter. Getting to reducing the level of debt out there is important, but I think, quite frankly, it takes an awful long time to adjust the spending patterns of this country to get to it. And I'm not seeing the leadership out of the White House or out of the Congress to actually take on some of the tough decisions that are necessary to reduce the debt.

CORNISH: President Trump took office shortly after, I would say, the Tea Party years, so to speak, where deficit hawks came to Washington and made a big stink about where the deficit was going under the Obama administration. You're nodding because you remember those days, as well. What was it like then?

HOAGLAND: Well, certainly, the deficit hawks at that time, the Tea Party, was focusing on that portion of the budget that I think is not the problem child, if you like, for what's creating some of the debt and deficits we have. And the Tea Party also was focusing not on any kind of increasing revenues - in fact, cutting taxes, not increasing taxes. And so I could never square the circle with the Tea Party that they could actually talk about real reductions in the debt and deficits by the nature of where they were focusing. They were focusing their attention on reducing those things in the government, which I considered to be the seed corn of the future, such as infrastructure, transportation, science, technology. It's hard. If you're really serious about reducing debt and deficits on the spending side, you have to take on the politically challenging issues that are the mandatory programs.

CORNISH: At the same time, former Vice President Dick Cheney once said deficits don't matter. I want to ask you because Democrats, of course, would say, look. Republicans only care about deficits when they're not in power.

HOAGLAND: Well, I go back a long way in the sense that - of the Ronald Reagan years, and he was focusing on deficit reduction. Even George Bush, the first Bush administration...

CORNISH: Both administrations, though, that embraced tax cuts much like this one.

HOAGLAND: They all were focusing on bringing the debt and deficit down. There's no question about it. But you're right. There's a change here. And I think the change right now, quite frankly, is not only does it go back to had Vice President Cheney's comments. The president himself here recently said, who cares about the budget? We don't have leadership right now. We don't have leadership like we had back - I worked for Senator Pete Domenici of New Mexico for many, many years. And he, along with - in a bipartisan manner, working with Lawton Chiles and other senators, Sam Nunn and others, worked to find common ground.

CORNISH: So is that a fair criticism? Are Democrats right to say, look - Republicans don't actually care about this issue? They wield it as a weapon when they're not in power.

HOAGLAND: Well, I think it's fair. I think it's fair today to say that. I don't think it's always been that case, but it's fair to say that is the situation today.

CORNISH: Where do you think these deficit hawks have gone?

HOAGLAND: (Laughter) Retirement. To heaven, I hope.

CORNISH: (Laughter).

HOAGLAND: Right now, it's not an issue for the American public, I think, is the problem. We have low unemployment rate. We have low inflation. People don't see what the damages are being caused by these debt and deficits, so party on. Interestingly enough, the young mayor from Indiana - and I'm from Indiana, so a little bias here - the young mayor from Indiana is talking about it as an issue. And that's the point...

CORNISH: So that's Pete Buttigieg.

HOAGLAND: ...Because it's his generation that's going to be impacted most by the fact that this debt and deficit is accumulating, and it's a tax on that generation coming up. So I find it interesting that he's focusing on it a little bit versus Mr. Sanders or some of the Baby Boomer generation that says, let's not worry about it. We have opportunities here to spend more money. Let's spend it.

CORNISH: But at the same time, if the U.S. does not take steps now, when?

HOAGLAND: That is the question. I use the analogy that Charles Schultze, an economist at Brookings, used to use, which is that it's like termites under the front porch. They're out there. They're working away. This debt and deficit's accumulating. This is the highest level that we've had in a peace-time period. Those termites are eating away. Someday, you're going to step out on that porch, and you're going to fall through. It's unclear when that happens. I still believe that's going to happen unless we start addressing it. The other factor I would say is maybe this generation never addressed it. But what it does it creates more pressure on future generations to pay the taxes or the interest payments on the debt that's accumulated by this current generation. Long after many of the members have gone, it will come as a future reducing the growth of this country in the future and putting pressure on our future generation, our children and our grandchildren.

CORNISH: That's William Hoagland of the Bipartisan Policy Center.

Thank you for coming in and talking through all of this with us.

HOAGLAND: Thank you.

Copyright © 2020 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.