Specter: Gonzales 'Likely Knew' of Confirmation Plan After questioning Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' former chief of staff, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) says he believes Gonzales "likely knew about" a plan to use the USA Patriot Act to circumvent Senate confirmation of U.S. attorneys. Specter questioned Sampson about the plan at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

Specter: Gonzales 'Likely Knew' of Confirmation Plan

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/9213692/9213693" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript


Now Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, the former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Welcome to the program, Senator Specter.

Senator ARLEN SPECTER (Republican, Pennsylvania): Thank you. Very nice to talk to you and your listeners. Thank you.

SIEGEL: We just heard you pressing Kyle Sampson about whether the attorney general knew about or approved of a plan to possibly run out the clock by using the USA Patriot Act. Were you satisfied with the answer that you received to that question?

Sen. SPECTER: I believe that the e-mails and the other documents strongly raise the inference that the attorney general did know that there was a plan to appoint attorneys under the provisions of the Patriot Act, which circumvented confirmation by the Senate. There is language about interim appointments, and that refers to the Patriot Act. And there are sequences where you have e-mails over a three-month period of time where Mr. Sampson's plan to use the Patriot Act circumvention is relied upon extensively. So the inference arises that in that time the attorney general likely knew about it.

SIEGEL: Well, some of your Democratic colleagues, several have called for the attorney general to resign. You've said you want to hear more facts. Did you hear enough facts today to settle that question in your mind?

Sen. SPECTER: The facts that I want to hear are from the attorney general himself. I think that we need to hear his testimony under oath. We have what he said at news conferences and what he's quoted as saying in the newspapers, but I'm not prepared to make a judgment. I don't think it's fair to make a judgment on that alone. He's scheduled to come before the Judiciary Committee, and I think we ought to let him have his day in court, hear him out, and then come to an informed judgment.

SIEGEL: You confronted Mr. Sampson, who was the attorney general's chief of staff, with the contradiction between what Attorney General Gonzales had said in March, that he wasn't at all involved in firing the U.S. attorneys, and then the e-mails. Are you inclined to be charitable and write off that contradiction to a faulty memory, or do you think the attorney general was trying to mislead the public in a news conference?

Sen. SPECTER: I'm not inclined to be charitable. I'm inclined to be factual. The key point was that in his March 13th news conference, the attorney general said he wasn't involved in discussions. And there is an e-mail on November 27th of last year which suggests that the attorney general was involved in a meeting on November 20th, where there presumably were discussions. And I think that the attorney general has to explain that and candidly, he's got a lot of explaining to do, but I think he ought to have the opportunity to do that before we come to a judgment.

SIEGEL: You have been overseeing the Department of Justice for many years from your seat on that committee. Is the picture that you're getting of Attorney General Gonzales' stewardship of Justice typical or unusually disengaged from, say, the decision of dismissing U.S. attorneys?

Sen. SPECTER: Well, I'm going to deal with Attorney General Gonzales. If you start to compare him to other attorneys general, there are lots of problems in the past that you could cite. But we have enough on our hands to figure out what happened with the U.S. attorneys here; and we've also got these national security letters, which is before the committee now. We had FBI Director Mueller in earlier this week, and we found that the FBI abused the national security letters, did not have sufficient factual basis to have them issued; relied on what was called exigent circumstances, emergency, and didn't back them up. And the attorney general is responsible for that as well. So, I want to hear him out on these two big issues, as I say, before I make up my own mind.

SIEGEL: But this last point. On the issue of the U.S. attorneys, is the attorney general in a no win situation where the best he can say is I really wasn't very much involved in what we were doing at the Department of Justice?

Sen. SPECTER: Well, let's hear what he has to say. Let's hear who made the judgment, asked these U.S. attorneys to resign. Now we have a factual record from Kyle Sampson. I want a factual record from Alberto Gonzales. And if they've done something wrong, I'll be the first to say so.

SIEGEL: Well, Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, thank you very much for talking with us.

Sen. SPECTER: Always glad to be with you, thank you.

Copyright © 2007 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.