History Of U.S. Presidential Concession Speeches There's no legal or constitutional requirement that the loser of a U.S. presidential election must concede. But the public concession speech is an important tradition, perhaps now more than ever.
NPR logo

How To Lose An Election: A Brief History Of The Presidential Concession Speech

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/929085584/930504088" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
How To Lose An Election: A Brief History Of The Presidential Concession Speech

How To Lose An Election: A Brief History Of The Presidential Concession Speech

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/929085584/930504088" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:

Presidential campaigns are essentially dramas, and we're in the final act of this one. For the past century, the moment of closure has come in the form of one simple act - the public concession. From the Radio Diaries podcast, Joe Richman brings us a history of how to lose an election.

JOE RICHMAN, BYLINE: There's no legal or constitutional requirement that the loser in a presidential election has to concede. It's a simple courtesy that began in 1896.

PAUL CORCORAN: Let me just try to find it here.

RICHMAN: Paul Corcoran is a political theorist who studies presidential campaigns. He pulls up a copy of a telegram that William Jennings Bryan sent to William McKinley two days after the election.

CORCORAN: And that telegram was this. (Reading) The returns indicate your election, and I hasten to extend my congratulations. We have submitted the issue to the American people, and their will is law.

RICHMAN: Those two sentences are considered to be the first public concession in U.S. presidential politics, and the tradition has continued in some form or another in every election since. Al Smith gave the first radio concession in 1928 after losing to Herbert Hoover. In 1940, moviegoers watched Wendell Willkie concede to FDR in a newsreel.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

WENDELL WILLKIE: People of America, I accept the result of the election with complete goodwill.

RICHMAN: And in 1952, Adlai Stevenson gave his concession on live television.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

ADLAI STEVENSON: I urge you all to give to General Eisenhower the support he will need to carry out the great tasks that lie before him.

RICHMAN: Over the past 120 years, there have been 32 presidential concession speeches. Paul Corcoran has analyzed them, and he says they are all strikingly similar.

CORCORAN: When you read through concession speeches, you see that they operate according to a template. There is a kind of a road map for a speech that you hoped you would never have to write.

RICHMAN: Corcoran says that concessions always feature these four elements. First, there's the statement of defeat, although you should never actually use the word defeat.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

THOMAS DEWEY: I've sent the following wire to President Truman.

RICHMAN: Here's Thomas Dewey in 1948.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

DEWEY: My heartiest congratulations to you on your election and every good wish for a successful administration.

RICHMAN: Second is the call to unite. This is Richard Nixon conceding to JFK in 1960.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

RICHARD NIXON: Our people, Republicans, Democrats alike, will unite behind our next president in seeing that America - in seeing...

UNIDENTIFIED GROUP: (Chanting) We want Nixon.

RICHMAN: Next, there's a celebration of democracy. Here's Hillary Clinton in 2016.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

HILLARY CLINTON: Our constitutional democracy enshrines the peaceful transfer of power. And we don't just respect that; we cherish it.

RICHMAN: Finally, the loser vows to continue fighting for the goals of the vanquished party - Hubert Humphrey in 1968.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

HUBERT HUMPHREY: I shall continue my personal commitment to the cause of human rights, of peace and to the betterment of man.

RICHMAN: You can often learn more about someone by the way they lose than by the way they win, says Paul Corcoran. That's why he's so interested in presidential concession speeches.

CORCORAN: The concession speech is the loser's attempt to convert loss into honor.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

JOHN MCCAIN: A little while ago, I had the honor of calling Senator Barack Obama to congratulate him.

(BOOING)

MCCAIN: Please.

RICHMAN: In 2008, John McCain's concession speech acknowledged that his defeat ushered in a historic moment.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

MCCAIN: A century ago, President Theodore Roosevelt's invitation of Booker T. Washington to dine at the White House was taken as an outrage in many quarters. America today is a world away from the cruel and prideful bigotry of that time. There is no better evidence of this than the election of an African American to the presidency of the United States.

RICHMAN: But maybe the most dramatic concession in U.S. history was in 2000. It played out over 36 days. Al Gore called George W. Bush to concede after a remarkably close election, only to call an hour later to take it back. After a recount and a Supreme Court case, Gore decided to concede again.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

AL GORE: Let there be no doubt. While I strongly disagree with the court's decision, I accept it. I accept the finality of this outcome, which will be ratified next Monday in the Electoral College. And tonight, for the sake of our unity as a people and the strength of our democracy, I offer my concession.

RICHMAN: There's no law that says a concession has to happen. It's just a custom, a tradition. But as elections get messier and uglier and voters are polarized, Paul Corcoran says a public concession is more important than ever.

CORCORAN: The whole election campaign is a kind of a formalized warfare. And so the more I looked at the concession speech, the more I realized that it was an extremely important political function. There needs to be a kind of a ceremonial recognition of an end.

RICHMAN: Corcoran says that ultimately, the concession isn't about the losing candidate accepting the loss. It's about their supporters accepting it. He says it's useful to think about it like a Shakespearean drama. At the end, there's a soliloquy or an epilogue, usually given amongst the fallen, lying around on the stage. The epilogue pronounces the scale of the tragedy and how, by bearing witness, the community can heal the wounds and restore harmony. Shakespeare, says Corcoran, would have known how to write a good concession speech.

KELLY: Joe Richman is host of the Radio Diaries podcast.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

Copyright © 2020 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.